time to polish titles, hypotheses and media text hooks. I will come and look over each person's shoulder for five minutes where I would like to see all three of those things (get them ready on separate screens to flick between) and then anything else you'd like to look at that we have time for.
Peer and self-assessment:
investigation
- insight (subtler points)
- evaluative approach e.g. use of words like revealing, significant, relevant
- systematic (equal depth for each point with terminology used precisely several times per paragraph and related to theory and explicitly to the hypothesis)
- discussion of what quantification can/cannot reveal
- considerations of comparability, reliablity and ethicality (as far as it is relevant) in both the methodology and the evaluation
- clear guiding of the reader with sub-headings within the methodology, analysis and conclusion and little overview paras for each section
- explanation of how far the hypotheses are supported/contradicted with tentative contextual exploration of the relevant GRAPE pressures, offering alternatives
- suitable hook
- all the relevant conventions
- all linguistic content transformed for non-specialist readers
- suitablility for specific audience(s)
- accuracy of SPAG
No comments:
Post a Comment